Search

Meghan Markle not first biracial member of British royals, expert says - Page Six

Meghan Markle is not the first biracial member of the British royal family, which traces its lineage to at least two queens of African origin, according to a royal expert.

“All of the British royals have African blood,” said Lady Colin Campbell, a Jamaica-born socialite who has written numerous books on the Windsors, including “People of Color and the Royals,” published in 2019.

One Black royal was Queen Charlotte, who is the focus of the Netflix series “Bridgerton,” Campbell told The Post. Born in 1774, Sophia Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz was a direct descendant of Margarita de Castro Souza, a Portuguese noblewoman who traced her line to Madragana Ben Aloandro, the North African mistress of Portugal’s King Afonso III in the 13th century. Historian Mario de Valdes y Cocom has said the depiction of Charlotte in royal paintings emphasizes her African features.

Bridgerton Golda Rosheuvel as Queen Charlotte.
Bridgerton Golda Rosheuvel as Queen Charlotte.

In addition to Charlotte, who was married to King George III, Campbell and other historians point to Philippa of Hainault, the wife and adviser to King Edward III. Philippa was of North African Moorish ancestry, born in northern France in 1314.

Philippa of Hainaul
Philippa of Hainaul

“When you take this history into consideration, accusing the royal family of racism is preposterous,” said Campbell, alluding to Markle’s recent interview with Oprah Winfrey in which she claimed that she was subjected to poor treatment because of her race and had suicidal thoughts. Markle also said one member of the royal family expressed concerns about her baby’s skin color before the birth of her son, Archie, in May, 2019.

According to Campbell, there was “constant intermarriage” among both British and European royals who have “proportionally a large percentage of African blood,” she said. And there was little in the way of racial prejudice until the latter part of the 17th century, when Britain’s West Indian colonies increasingly relied on slave labor for the cultivation of sugar cane.

“When sugar started to become more important than gold to the British community, slaves who worked the fields were dehumanized,” she said.

The Hon. John Spencer (1708-1746), his son the 1st Earl Spencer (1734-1783) and their servant, Caesar Shaw
John Spencer, Earl Spencer and
Caesar Shaw.

It has been debated whether Princess Diana’s family, the Spencers, were among the slave-owning gentry. An 18th-century portrait of ancestor John Spencer depicts him and his son, also named John — the future first Earl Spencer — with a Black man named Caesar Shaw crouching near a dog. Shaw has been described by historians alternately as a slave or a servant. Many Spencers are listed in a database of historic British slaveholders though it’s unclear how closely related they are to Diana’s line.  

Campbell, who has appeared on British celebrity reality shows and wrote one of the first biographies of Princess Diana in 1992 (“Diana in Private”), has also written “Meghan and Harry: The Real Story.” She is no fan of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. She called Markle’s recent interview with Winfrey “the cynical ploy on behalf of a greedy woman.”

“I think Meghan Markle is … a very destructive and divisive operator who is reckless about the damage she does as long as she achieves her objectives, which are fame and fortune,” said Campbell.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Article From & Read More ( Meghan Markle not first biracial member of British royals, expert says - Page Six )
https://ift.tt/3qIzJ9N
Entertainment

Bagikan Berita Ini

0 Response to "Meghan Markle not first biracial member of British royals, expert says - Page Six"

Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger.